The underbelly of the Church
by Elouise
Below is a quote from Simone Weil about the social and patriotic power of the Church. Not church as we know it on Sunday mornings, but the Church as a powerful institution within a political setting.
Weil wrote during the Nazi era. Her words are troubling, given the rise of the white Evangelical church’s political influence in the USA. Sometimes on Sunday mornings, but also in public arenas where religious language virtually baptizes political figures as agents of God, up to and including Mr. Trump.
In light of the Nazi era, this turn of events is more than troubling. Many, though not all German Protestant and Catholic churches, including pastors and revered theologians, colluded in the rise of Hitler. Their open support amounted to baptizing Hitler as God’s agent sent as their Great Leader at this time. Yes, there would be some bloodshed. But in the end, life will be better for those who survive, and Germany itself will gain esteem throughout the world.
Here’s what Simone Weil had to say about herself and the Church during the Nazi era. I read this as a comment on both Protestant and Catholic churches in Germany, though she refers to the Catholic Church. Highlights are mine.
All things carefully considered, I believe they come down to this: what scares me is the Church as a social thing. Not solely because of her stains, but by the very fact that it is, among other characteristics, a social thing.
Not that I am by temperament very individualistic. I fear for the opposite reason. I have in myself a strongly gregarious spirit. I am by natural disposition extremely easily influenced in excess, and especially by collective things. I know that if in this moment I had before me twenty German youth singing Nazi songs in chorus, part of my soul would immediately become Nazi. It is a very great weakness of mine. . . .
I am afraid of the patriotism of the Church that exists in the Catholic culture. I mean ‘patriotism’ in the sense of sentiment analogous to an earthly homeland. I am afraid because I fear contracting its contagion. Not that the Church appears unworthy of inspiring such sentiment, but because I don’t want any sentiment of this kind for myself.
Simone Weil, Waiting for God
Published by Harper Perennial in 1950 to celebrate 100 years since Weil’s birth
I couldn’t agree more. I’m also troubled by the silence of many white Evangelical churches that (rightly) choose not to get on the Trump bandwagon. Silence often enables the abuse of power. I don’t want to catch the silence virus. Hence this post and others to remind me that I have a voice, it counts, and I must exercise it regularly.
©Elouise Renich Fraser, 28 March 2018
Image found at books.google.com
In the context of what you have said before, I don’t quite follow this line .”I’m also troubled by the silence of churches that refuse to get on the Trump bandwagon.” Could you add a little more please.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It would be encouraging to see more evangelical churches who are not publicly jumping onto the Trump ‘bandwagon’ being up-front about the dilemmas we face in this cultural and political climate as (presumably all of us) followers of Jesus Christ first and foremost. I’m thinking, for example, of the anxiety of school children and their parents, or the importance of showing hospitality to ‘strangers’ such as immigrants or people who aren’t like us. I don’t think the pulpit is primarily political, but it definitely offers a way of helping us stay grounded and pointed in a life-giving direction, rather than sitting back as though business as usual were appropriate. Does that help? The conservative evangelical church here has never bought fully into social justice issues as part of our responsibility. I’m not part of the conservative evangelical church, but I am evangelical, though it’s difficult to call myself that now. I’m speaking mainly about the white evangelical church in the US. The almost 80 percent that supported (and still supports) Trump regardless of what he says or does.
LikeLike
I thought that is what you were saying but it sounded at first to be a contradiction.
Has anyone issued the statement that “silence implies agreement”
LikeLike
Thanks, John. I’m grateful for your first inquiry. Given your question, I made some changes to make things as clear as possible.
Silence can indeed speak volumes. Over here we say “silence implies consent.” Not always a good place to land, and frequently a sign of fear–sometimes well-founded fear. I haven’t heard anyone using that language yet about our current situation.
LikeLike
Interesting that you quote an author writing about the rise of Adolf Hitler. I just happen to be reading “Bonhoeffer” by Eric Metaxas. It tells a lot about the early rise of Hitler, and is extremely interesting and very thorough.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi, Waldo. David says we have this book by Metaxas, though only he has read it. The rise of Hitler is a fascinating, illuminating study in human and dynamics. Chilling and mesmerizing. Not to be forgotten, either, in my opinion.
LikeLike
I have been searching for answers to the silence. Are there any?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi, April! I wish I knew. But I’ve been in enough churches (of various kinds) to know that in my neck of the woods it seems African-American churches are much more likely to respond in helpful ways (from the pulpit and by way of programs) to events of the day. Some take political sides; others do what I wish to see more of–helping us think about the meaning of following Jesus no matter what our political preferences are, and no matter what the cost.
Ironically, I’m guessing that the silence of churches is often due to fear. Perhaps fear of losing members. In Hitler’s day, there was a different price to pay if you bucked Hitler’s claims. It took courage for a church and its leaders to take a stand against what Hitler was doing and against the idea that Hitler could somehow make things all better. Hitler wasn’t God, and Trump isn’t God. Yet we’re to function as good citizens in the midst of all this. Without giving our allegiance to Trump, or overlooking things we wouldn’t overlook in a pastor, for example. Your question gets me going! I think I need to write more about this….:)
Thanks for the great question. If you find any answers, let us know!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I recently had a friend block me on Facebook because of a calm conversation thread turned sideways. She calls Trump her God. I don’t understand. She calls herself Christian but I’m not sure she understands what that means, or maybe she interprets information I don’t understand. In my opinion, religion carries love and tolerance with it. I remember a song we used to sing in Sunday School….Jesus Loves the Little Children. That’s what I learned. I have great difficulty trying to even like our president because I find him offensive to too many.
LikeLike
I don’t think love means overlooking wrongdoing or churlishness–especially in a leader.
At the same time, it helps me process my responses to him by imagining that I’m looking in a mirror (when I watch him) and can see that I recognize in him the self-contempt I’ve struggled with in myself. In that moment I’m able to connect–though I know it isn’t going to make his behavior acceptable. Especially for the President of the United States. Leaders are held to higher standards. When they consistently fail to meet those standards, it’s time to hold them accountable, no matter which political party we belong to or why. Our lives and the lives of people around the globe are impacted by his decisions and attitudes.
Also, Trump is in no way God. Just as you and I are not God. Which, in the end, is a comfort and encourages me to speak out with honesty, clarity and faith. My future rests in the hands of God–not the hands of any human beings, no matter what they do. I write those words and immediately want to take them back–it’s difficult to live truth boldly, calmly and consistently.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I surely wish he had some discipline.
LikeLiked by 1 person